中文版  /  English  / 

Website Name

Contact us
0769-85309856
Home > News > Industry information

The fragile new generation electronic engineer: how should we go ahead

2018-01-10 18:32:03 Website Name Read

As an engineer, my point is to think about how many bombs and drugs the school provides for our industrial sectors, how much knowledge and how many abilities I have learned. In order to express my views briefly, it is more common to express it by digital flow.




One of the thinking: internal factors


1. why are students now less than they used to be? This is a common problem that most engineers and leaders have found. There are several points:


A. School of education resources: the class teacher is not enough lead to a serious decline in the quality of courses, I enrolled in 2001 on the number is small, the instrument engineering department, a total of 70 people are together. Similar courses have analog circuits, circuit analysis, and relatively small numbers. Now you go to compare, at least I read a master's first grade calculation method and the matrix theory of the number of more than 150+. All the assignments are responsible for the teaching assistants, and the assistants have also been in the two grade, and see the individual. From the point of training the students, the big lesson is a disaster.


B. teacher's guiding problem: at present, the education orientation in Colleges and universities is not to teach students well. He used his former teacher Zhai's words to prepare lessons for him, which is his personal hobby. The school requires papers, projects and funds, which is the status of the engineering school.


C. from the student itself, the whole social environment has changed too much. I was unfortunate to meet the Shanghai 100 thousand + peak of the college entrance examination, and the rate of access at the time of high school was low. There are many teachers who have been retired in high school, including the principal and the Vice Chancellor. I want to say that the quality of education began to deteriorate in high school. In fact, the most important function of education is to train engineers' logical analysis and basic problem-solving ability. Although examination oriented examination is somewhat single, it is undeniable that all problems are based on finding solutions.


D. undergraduate stage, actually pinch the end of the real learning time is about 2 and a half years. From high school basic knowledge and basic theory, to university or basic knowledge basic theory, the essence of most people can not see what the use of things. In electronics, introduces the design and development of the school may have many projects, but how to do things, the most basic rules of the school is the development of divergent type, you can do a DEMO function is very wide, but in the details is a tragedy, most cannot be repeated. Frankly, I see a lot of the current standards for electric vehicles is from the school professor (99% assistants do), called the combination, I can only express the silence.


2. why is there a lot of pressure from the conversion of students to engineers? It is more appropriate to talk about this problem with my personal feelings.


A. you don't have too many ways to standardize and do things in any web site or journal. Therefore, when I face the process of automotive electronics, face strict quality control, face the communication between different departments and the production process of factory standard process, I will be very helpless. Because the school even completed a number of projects under the condition, also do some improvements on the basis of the brothers and sisters, do some advanced platform or low-level platform application development, even in the face of a small part of a project, most of the time we can only choose to choose learning, to enrich themselves, rather than to start to fight.


B. companies like to introduce fresh blood, because many engineers will develop some of their own bad working habits. But whether to be ready to accept the challenge is to give a large part of the leadership, like A, to complete some of the key challenges and difficulties. I don't think he was prepared enough, and he didn't have enough experience to do the work. Why do we have leaders to ask him to go? First, we feel anxious to get ahead, pay a high salary and get a sense of achievement and high position. All of these are based on the corresponding responsibilities. As long as the front does not consider the following is the typical feature of most people, not many people can exception. The second is fault. Microelectronics and most advanced manufacturing industries lack enough experienced engineers. If you give A Jun time, give him an experienced mentor, give him some opportunities to try and learn. I believe he will become a very excellent engineer and will be a very good leader. It seems like climbing a ladder to a ladder, but without a step to jump up, there is a great possibility that it is a fall. Former leaders have talked about that young engineers need to finish a little bit of work at the grass-roots level, build confidence and trust in your team.


At the last point of C., a word is said by the old man: the character determines the fate, the spirit determines the pattern. We need to think about whether we can enter or retire. If we have the opportunity to participate in important projects, we need to cherish. If we find that ability or position is not suitable, we must not make more mistakes in position. There is a large accumulation of knowledge and experience of the engineer's help in foreign countries, also need 3 to 5 years to become a take charge as chief of engineers. Sometimes we are in school or not proud and arrogant to work on their own, the company is not a good thing.


My opinion may be biased, but I still feel sorry for my alumni A. BLESS A, come on!